Baumblog EST 1968 - A blog for the Baumbachs who originated in Syracuse, NY

Over the next two nights, there will be three Game Sevens played--I haven't seen anything like this that I can recall.

Boston has stormed back from being down 3-1 to Carolina and take on the Canes in Boston Thursday.

Anaheim and Detroit have been trading games back and forth. Detroit hosts Anaheim in Detroit Thursday.

The Capitals and Penguins are also having a whale of a series--Caps went up 2-0, Pens won three straight, and the Caps forced Game 7 with an OT winner on Monday. Caps are hosting Pittsburg tonight for their final game.

All of these games will be on VS (possibly the NHL network for the second game on Thursday, VS will join it in progress if possible). You might want to catch them, even if you don't normally watch hockey. Game Sevens tend to be special affairs, and are steeped in hockey history and tradition. Exciting stuff!

Kristen said 6 minutes later

This is the point at which their facial hair has grown to their knees, correct?
GJ said about 1 hour later

No, that's the finals. :) We're still in the quarter-finals.
Marc said about 2 hours later

I really hope the Canes win. I've been trying to get to one of the playoff games, just been too busy and man the ticket prices have skyrocketed!
GJ said about 3 hours later

I picked a Boston - Chicago final....Original Six, baby!

Still, Game Sevens can go any which way, and often do. It does definitely help to be in your home arena, but even then pucks can still bounce funny. I think Detroit and Boston will win, but I can't even hazard a guess as to the result of the Washington-Pittsburgh game. That will be the big one to watch, IMHO.

The Canes will probably live to regret letting Boston back in, but then again they let the Oilers back into the series in the 2006 Finals and still closed that one out for the Cup. This time around, though, they will be trying to do that in Boston. A tall order, for sure.

I have a funny feeling Detroit is going to throttle Anaheim. Call it a vision--I see something like 6-1. Of course, this is BS, and it won't shock me if it's a very low-scoring OT affair. I still think Detroit is like a time bomb, ready to go off.
Marc said about 5 hours later

The Canes really are a "light switch" (TM) team. I've seen some games against Buffalo where they were absolutely on their game. Then the very next game, they get blown out. So while I think they could edge Boston, I don't think a Cup run is in the works this year.
GJ said about 6 hours later

Ah, that explains their 1996-97 season. :)
GJ said about 11 hours later

To those I told to watch tonight's game....I'm so sorry! Washington is washing out. Of course, they just scored their first goal late in the second period, now they're only down 5-1. No problem, right?
Kristen said about 24 hours later

That was embarrassing. I didn't watch it, but heard it was a disaster.
Eric said 1 day later

Hopefully the Wings are a good time bomb and devastate all who stand in their way right through to the cup. We don't want the time bomb that falls apart in the last thirty seconds of the third period and loses the series tonight!
GJ said 1 day later

Oh, you mean like the one Carolina unleashed on New Jersey last round? That, my friends, was hockey history--I don't think I've ever seen such a sudden reversal of fortune like that one.

I don't like the Wings, but I really hate the Ducks and will be rooting for the (sunshine) Wings tonight. Next round, I'm rooting for Chicago, though.

Meanwhile, I can't believe that I won't get to see any of the Bruins game tonight. I so want to see them waste the Canes.
GJ said 1 day later

Crap, the Bruins lost in OT. Carolina has more lives than a cat. Both games were far better than the one Wednesday night, that's for sure. At least we get an original-six match up in the West.
Marc said 4 days later

Go Canes! We'll see how they fair against the Penguins. Those two have had some pretty close games over the season.
GJ said 4 days later

Yeah, both series should be good.

Geoff said about 20 hours later

No it isn't. Are we going to turn to the government for everything? How about fly with a different carrier? Or not fly at all...or build your own plane and fly it. The government has their hands in too much already, and look what they've done. They killed Pontiac. Bastards.

Eric said about 20 hours later

I tend to agree with GJ on this one, to a point. When it comes to passenger air travel, I believe the government needs to be fairly involved. I'm not saying more oversight is needed, but maybe more enforcement. There's no question that airlines, especially discount ones, will put profit in front of safety. The federal government must make sure the interstate and international air travel meets safety standards.

But yes, Geoff. The Fed has their hands in WAY to much already. And they have for many, many years.

Geoff said about 21 hours later

Yeah I thought I would bite on GJ's proposition. Anytime I rag on the Government I usually incite some retaliation...especially tossing GM into the equation haha

Kristen said 1 day later

And people laugh at me for refusing to ride on turbo props. Ha!

GJ said 1 day later

This guy could have been flying anything and would have crashed it. :)

Steve said 4 days later

Geez, the two big time democrats are complaining about how much involvement the government has in private business and people's lives? Are you sure you're in the right party?

Geoff said 4 days later

I consider myself a Libertarian more than Democrat...though I don't look to dissolve the whole government, just a good portion of it :)

GJ said 4 days later

Do show me where I'm complaining about that, please.

Let's see, I said "Boy, the world would be a simpler place if, I dunno, people took responsibility for themselves and those in their care.

I didn't say "Boy, the world would be a simpler place if, I dunno, people took responsibility for themselves and those in their care. So, let's legislate with that in mind and see how it shakes out." That's the GOP line. The Dem line would probably be "Boy, the world would be a simpler place if, I dunno, people took responsibility for themselves and those in their care. Thanks to human nature being what it is, we'll have to put legislative control in to make sure this never happens again."

I specifically stayed away from making an opinion on this one, which is also why my lone previous comment was a dig on this particular pilot's abilities, or lack thereof.

Unlike Geoff, I'm no Paulite. I'm more of a fiscal conservative, social liberal kind of guy. In other words, it depends on the issue. However, if there was an anti-Woo party, I'd be that. :)

I don't think you can say the words "fiscal conservative" and "social liberal" in the same sentence. :)

That's why you're a Libertarian, and I'm not.